Moral Alignment Test
Sixteen concrete dilemmas. No right answer, just yours.
You'll probably like these too
About this test
The lawful-chaotic and good-evil axes come from 1970s tabletop role-playing games, which wanted a shortcut for playing consistent characters. The first axis isn't about kindness but about your relationship with the framework: do you trust rules or your own judgement? The second is about what you put first, the other person or yourself.
It's a crude model, and that's exactly why it works: most real moral disagreements aren't about good versus evil, they're about that first axis. Two people who sincerely want the same thing can fight for years — one because they refuse to go around the procedure, the other because they refuse to wait for the procedure to wake up.
The sixteen questions here are deliberately small and concrete: a wallet, a parking bay, an expense claim, a neighbour. Grand philosophical dilemmas are easy because they cost nothing. Your actual ethics show up in what you do over fifty euros or five minutes of lateness.
How it works
Every answer votes for one alignment. The most-chosen one becomes your result, and the percentage breakdown shows your secondary leanings — almost nobody is pure on both axes. No alignment is better than another: they describe ways of deciding, not objective moral worth.
This test is provided for entertainment purposes only. It is not a diagnosis or professional advice.